IB2014131 ART. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: ETHICAL AND SCIENTIFIC SOURCES OF TENSION
- Write a review
Article: Environmental protection: ethical and scientific sources of tension
Vincent DEVICTOR
Chargé de recherche, à l’Institut des sciences de l’évolution de Montpellier (ISEM), Université Montpellier 2, UMR 5554-CNRS, Université de Montpellier II Université Paris 1. Sorbonne. CETCOPRA Centre d’étude des techniques, des connaissances et des pratiques
Abstract
Environmental ethic is complex, dynamic, and related to cultural contexts that are neither given once and for all, nor valid for all people. Yet, the current biodiversity crisis tends to be followed by the spread of universal values related to nature and its protection. Far from standardizing the pluralism of these values, this universal trend leads to two major tensions in the field of nature conservation. The first concerns the scientific or epistemic values: nature or “biodiversity” is altogether being reduced in sub-categories or by contrast considered as a complex object by modern ecological science. Biodiversity is indeed both increasingly considered in terms of its complexity and unpredictability, or on the contrary, as a collection of natural objects that can and must be managed with easily quantifiable indicators. The second tension concerns ethical values. These values tend to be reduced and simplified in equating nature with “services” that can benefit human societies. But this utilitarian reduction also hides a diversification of ethical values. This article aims to analyze what characterizes this contemporary ethical and scientific floating with respect to the values involved in the protection of nature.
Thank you for the reviews ! Your comment is submitted
16 other products in the same category:
Much has been said and written about work motivation since the advent of modern organizations. Management theories of motivation have focused their input on the identification of external stimuli that could be operated by organizations and over, the managers, with a view to stimulate the motivation of individuals. This article proposes a reversal of approach. Work motivation is understood as a highly dynamic individual resulting from the investment activities of three registers: Bonds, Initiatives and Aspirations. These three books are indispensable to each individual to work and are specific to each (the content varies from one individual to another) and are constantly changing, as and when they are actually invested and that the individual gets older. This conceptualization builds a new approach to the management of organizational motivation: the direction it proposes is to make each individual work of both the guardian and regulator of its Obligations / Initiatives / Aspirations.
Much has been said and written about work motivation since the advent of modern organizations. Management theories of motivation have focused their input on the identification of external stimuli that could be operated by organizations and over, the managers, with a view to stimulate the motivation of individuals. This article proposes a reversal of approach. Work motivation is understood as a highly dynamic individual resulting from the investment activities of three registers: Bonds, Initiatives and Aspirations. These three books are indispensable to each individual to work and are specific to each (the content varies from one individual to another) and are constantly changing, as and when they are actually invested and that the individual gets older. This conceptualization builds a new approach to the management of organizational motivation: the direction it proposes is to make each individual work of both the guardian and regulator of its Obligations / Initiatives / Aspirations.