GC201311133 ART. The postures of combat and understanding in social liberation
- Write a review
Abstracts
Can people free themselves from their social determinants? For Pierre Bourdieu, only a deep socioanalysis of social conditioning can open the way to freedom. Clinical sociology, with reference to Vincent de Gaulejac, has criticized this approach for placing “combat” over “understanding” and thus blocking “reflexivity” and liberation. As this article points out, understanding plays a considerable but often overlooked role in Bourdieu’s work, along with combat. The conjunction of understanding and combat is present in every movement for social liberation, as shown herein on three different scales: symbolic violence between two subjects, macrosocial domination, and clan oppression in an occupational group.
Thank you for the reviews ! Your comment is submitted
16 other products in the same category:
Following the fire in the Mont Blanc tunnel, a new regulation was passed requiring each tunnel of a study of its specific risks and, for the transit of dangerous goods, a comparison with the risks alternative routes. In the practical implementation of these new studies, the temptation was great to multiply and more sophisticated modeling of fires, scenario analysis, the probability calculations, the criteria for making rational choices ... Group working to develop good practices, which had both an extensive field experience and scientific instruments, has gradually converged to a specific doctrine of "reasonable use" of science by their place in the traditional arguments based on simple rules, but tough. Be described by the complex trade-offs made between two logics, the logic "hyperrationnelle" and the pragmatic logic, which are always more or less tension in the regulation of risk.
Following the fire in the Mont Blanc tunnel, a new regulation was passed requiring each tunnel of a study of its specific risks and, for the transit of dangerous goods, a comparison with the risks alternative routes. In the practical implementation of these new studies, the temptation was great to multiply and more sophisticated modeling of fires, scenario analysis, the probability calculations, the criteria for making rational choices ... Group working to develop good practices, which had both an extensive field experience and scientific instruments, has gradually converged to a specific doctrine of "reasonable use" of science by their place in the traditional arguments based on simple rules, but tough. Be described by the complex trade-offs made between two logics, the logic "hyperrationnelle" and the pragmatic logic, which are always more or less tension in the regulation of risk.