MU201412330 ART. THE TRUE CAUSES OF THE STATE OF IGNORANCE, JEAN-FRANÇOIS BOELY, 1806
- Write a review
Article: The true causes of the state of ignorance, Jean-François Boëly, 1806
Nicolas MEEUS
Professeur à l’Université Paris-Sorbonne, Rédacteur en chef de Musurgia.
Abstract
The work published by Jean-François Boëly in 1806, following the adoption of Catel’s Traité d’harmonie by the Paris Conservatoire, retained the attention mainly because of its polemic tone. However, some of the points of theory that Boëly merely sketches, unfortunately, are not devoid of interest. In particular, Boëly strongly links the function of chords to their form : perfect chord for the tonic, “accord sensible” (i. e. dominant seventh) for the “dominante-tonique”, “dissonant sixth” for the subdominant and “simple seventh” for the second degree. One would wish to know more about the theorist.
Thank you for the reviews ! Your comment is submitted
16 other products in the same category:
The example of a mixed economy company has a land development fraud neglected by the literature: there is widespread fraud, little by little, the top-down by imitation and addiction, in collusion implied. Literature was more interested, in fact, illegal maneuvers in the eyes of the officer or prohibited by law. But she had not modeled the process by which fraud is formed, grows and finds an end. Based on the case of the SEM, we propose a model for the dissemination of fraud and we discuss its possible generalization, while analyzing the appropriateness of traditional measures of fight against fraud.
The example of a mixed economy company has a land development fraud neglected by the literature: there is widespread fraud, little by little, the top-down by imitation and addiction, in collusion implied. Literature was more interested, in fact, illegal maneuvers in the eyes of the officer or prohibited by law. But she had not modeled the process by which fraud is formed, grows and finds an end. Based on the case of the SEM, we propose a model for the dissemination of fraud and we discuss its possible generalization, while analyzing the appropriateness of traditional measures of fight against fraud.